top of page
  • Writer's picturePhil Griffis

Clear Lake Medical Malpractice Suit

A Clear Lake (Houston) orthopedic surgeon and hospital have recently been sued for alleged medical malpractice in connection with a 2010 hip replacement surgery. The suit, while very short on details, alleges that the defendants failed to timely and properly monitor and treat the patient’s condition, failed to timely and properly diagnose her, failed to “properly position, protect and prevent harm to the nerves which enervate the left leg of the Plaintiff during” the surgery, failed to properly review the results of diagnostic testing and failed to provide appropriate follow up care.

These acts, the patient claims, caused her serious, irreversible and disabling neurological injuries to her leg, including a “drop foot” and sciatic nerve injury. She sues for pain and suffering, mental anguish, medical bills, disfigurement and loss of earnings.

All of the defendants have answered the suit, and have denied the patient’s allegations.

The patient will face an uphill battle due to “tort reform” legislation governing Texas medical malpractice litigation. For instance, her case will be dismissed if she does not, within 120 days of the filing of the suit, produce reports from qualified experts supporting her allegations of malpractice and damages resulting from it. Any non-economic damages (pain and suffering, disfigurement, impairment) she is eventually awarded by the jury will be capped at $250,000. And any medical expenses she is awarded will be limited to that paid or owed. This is a relatively new, but major, development in Texas law.

For example, assume a victim of medical malpractice, as a result of the substandard care, has to be treated at a hospital, and that the hospital sends the patient a bill in the amount of $10,000. Also assume that the patient pays a $100 co-pay, that his health insurance company pays $2,000 and the hospital writes off the remaining $7,900 of the bill. Until several years the patient, if he wins his lawsuit, could recover the full $10,000. Now, his recovery would be limited to $2,100.

Texas medical malpractice litigation is a minefield.  Call us if you need our help in navigating through it.


Phil Griffis obtained his first jury verdict in 1990, when he convinced a jury that a customer’s fall at his client’s store did not cause the customer’s aspiration pneumonia and stroke. In the years since he has continued to win in courtrooms across the State of Texas.

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Next Up For Fox News - The Smartmatic Lawsuit

Fox News will have little “breathing room” following its enormous three-quarters of a billion dollars defamation settlement payout to Dominion Voting Systems. Waiting in the wings of the courthouse is

Shareholders Sue Southwest For Mass Flight Cancellations

A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against Southwest Airlines in response to the operational disaster that resulted in nearly 17,000 canceled flights over the recent holiday travel seas

Buying Time for Your Business with Standstill Agreements

Standstill Agreements are a little known legal tool that could literally save your business, or someone else’s, during the current crisis. At its most basic, a Standstill Agreement puts a temporary "f


Mengomentari telah dimatikan.
bottom of page